![]() |
Great Lakes Regional Pollution Prevention Roundtable
Promoting Pollution Prevention Through Information Exchange
|
||||
|
Please note that the Topic Hubs developed by this Center have been archived and are no longer being updated.
GLRPPR has converted several of its Topic Hubs to LibGuides, which allowed for integration of some social features. View the converted hubs, as well as other LibGuides related to pollution prevention and sustainability, in the University of Illinois' LibGuides Community.
This hub is intended to introduce technical assistance providers
or "change agents" to an assistance approach and system that facilitates
the adoption of alternative technologies that reduce or eliminate waste
at manufacturing facilities. This Topic Hub does not advise the user on
a specific technology or industry. This Topic Hub also offers a compilation of relevant on-line resources
including documents and technical contacts. The key technical contacts are
individuals who have direct experience with carrying out the steps and
recommendations presented in this Topic Hub and they can provide advice
when needed. For the purpose of simplifying the information presented, "change agents"
refers to individuals involved with assisting industry with pollution prevention,
environmental compliance, and manufacturing assistance. This may include
technical assistance providers from university programs, state pollution prevention
agencies, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) manufacturing
extension agents, consultants, vendors, etc. From this point forward, this group
of individuals will be referred to as change agents. In this hub "pollution prevention (P2) benefits" include the prevention of
the generation of both regulated and non-regulated waste, as well as the use of
alternative materials that are less polluting, and minimizing the amount of raw
materials used or consumed in a process (including water). P2 benefits also include
reducing energy and labor inputs. This Topic Hub refers to industrial technology diffusion, which leads to the
prevention of pollution. This does not necessarily refer to computer technology
diffusion, but may not exclude aspects of computer technologies associated with
manufacturing. Under most circumstances, the success or failure of the widespread adoption
of a technology associated with effectively addressing P2 problems is dependent
on one or more of the activities summarized below: Technology Development - For problems that currently do not have satisfactory solutions.
The technical aspects must be developed to a point such that the technology
is simple, compatible and rugged enough to be used in real-world applications.
Additionally, the technical advantages (economics, materials efficiency, etc.)
must be well established. These activities are performed predominantly by researchers
and entrepreneurs. Technology Transfer - For solutions that are not readily available on the open market.
The technology must have moved beyond the laboratory testing and demonstration
phases. It needs to be marketed to private sector entities willing to commercialize
the technology. These activities are performed primarily by lawyers and business
specialists such as venture capitalists. Technology Diffusion - For solutions that are commercially available but have not achieved widespread market penetration.
Clients need technology education assistance to create technology awareness and
promote understanding of technical principles. Uncertainty issues associated with
how to implement the technology must be resolved. This is often accomplished through
demonstrations and pilot trials. These activities are usually performed by sales people,
technical assistance providers, and consultants. Technology diffusion addresses the broader scope and approach of facilitating change
or implementation of technologies that reduce raw material use and waste at industrial
facilities, thus achieving pollution prevention (P2). With this approach, change agents
combine traditional assistance methods with site-specific information, assistance
information and on-site help with how to implement a particular technology. This
includes technology demonstrations and on-site pilot trials. It is followed up with
evaluations and outcomes along with recommendations and conclusions as to whether the technology
may achieve the intended goal (reduce waste and save money) for the individual facility. Prevention tends to be a difficult concept to sell because the benefits occur in an
unknown distant future and require real behavior change, which can reduce comfort and
increase complexity. For example, seatbelts were not widely adopted until laws were
instituted that required their use, despite the fact that the advantages of seatbelts,
in terms of injury prevention, were well documented and publicized. Additionally, government change agents that actively promote P2 are generally regarded
as being "very different from" or even "hostile to" the private sector entities they are
trying to influence. Businesses do not normally turn to government agencies as sources of
innovation. Three types of knowledge are involved in the decision to adopt or reject an innovation: Most entities that are actively trying to promote P2 have focused on creating the first
step "awareness knowledge" of P2 practices. Emphasis has been placed on creating fact
sheets, case studies, databases, and Internet resources. These materials are generally
effective at describing the advantages of various P2 practices. The change agents that
distribute the awareness materials often become frustrated with their clients for not
adopting the practices because they feel that the awareness information should be adequate
to justify adoption. However, many change agents fail to recognize that assistance with
developing sound technical principles and "how-to" support regarding implementation of P2
practices are also often required to ensure that the uncertainty level associated with the
practices is reduced to a point where adoption will occur. Additionally, very few regulatory requirements have been instituted that require the
implementation of P2. While most potential P2 adopters recognize its value and importance,
the choice to adopt P2 remains predominantly optional, with little urgency associated with
it. Consequently, P2 tends to be pushed aside in favor of more immediate compliance-oriented
strategies that are not optional. The adoption rate of innovations tends to be affected by five basic characteristics: P2 innovations tend to exhibit strong relative advantage attributes. However, they
are often perceived to be complex and incompatible with existing methods of operation.
Fortunately, many P2 technologies exhibit strong observability and trialability
characteristics that can be used to effectively address these problems. Technology
demonstrations and extended pilot trials can reduce uncertainty associated with the
technology's complexity and compatibility. Most P2 technical assistance providers focus the bulk of their technology-related
efforts on education. This approach includes activities such as workshops, seminars,
distributing case studies, fact sheets, internet resources, etc. These practices
distribute large amounts of information to many customers at a relatively modest cost.
Methods and materials such as these offer great vehicles for creating P2 technology
awareness and for explaining the technical principles behind the technologies.
However, as previously noted, technology education alone does not usually provide the
site-specific information required for widespread implementation. While awareness and understanding are certainly important information elements in
the decision-making process, additional information and performance confirmation by
opinion leaders is required before a client will choose to adopt a technology.
Utilization of time-tested innovation diffusion principles to promote P2 technology
adoption offers motivation to P2 change agents and offers them an approach to acquire
additional skills required to improve their effectiveness. Generally, alternative technologies that result in the prevention of waste and
pollution are applied to manufacturing production and maintenance processes where
the opinion of environmental regulators is not necessarily a motivating change factor.
For P2 technologies, the opinions of company personnel, trusted vendors, competitors
and peers are considered to be most important. Most decisions to adopt or reject an
innovation are based on a subjective evaluation of the innovation grounded by input
from peers who have implemented or at least understand the technology and are
perceived to be credible.
|
GLRPPR is a member of the Pollution Prevention Resource Exchange, a national network of regional information centers: NEWMOA (Northeast), WRRC (Southeast), GLRPPR (Great Lakes), ZeroWasteNet (Southwest), P2RIC (Plains), Peaks to Prairies (Mountain), WSPPN (Pacific Southwest), PPRC (Northwest). |
||||
One East Hazelwood Drive; Champaign, IL; 61820; (800) 407-0261; glrppr@istc.illinois.edu